Cortes-Jofre, Patricia

Aim: To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, CPG developer websites, lung cancer societies, and oncology organizations to identify CPGs providing recommendations on treatments for NSCLC. The methodological quality for each CPG was determined independently by three appraisers using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) instrument. Results: Twenty-two CPGs met the eligibility criteria. The median scores per AGREE II domain were: scope and purpose 90.7% (64.8–100%), stakeholder involvement 76.9% (27.8–96.3%); rigor of development 80.9% (27.1–92.4%); clarity of presentation 89.8% (50–100%); applicability 46.5% (12.5–87.5%); and editorial independence 91.7% (27.8–100%). Most of the CPGs (54.5%) were rated as “recommended with modifcations” for clinical use. Conclusions: Overall, the methodological quality of CPGs proving recommendations on the management of NSCLC is moderate, but there is still room for improvement in their development and implementation.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the clinical effects and safety of clozapine compared with quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders.

Background: This is the second update of this Cochrane Review. Some studies have suggested a protective effect of antioxidant nutrients and higher dietary levels of fruits and vegetables on lung cancer. Objectives: To determine whether vitamins and minerals and other potential agents, alone or in combination, reduce lung cancer incidence and lung cancer mortality in healthy populations. Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase from 1974 to May 2019 and screened references included in published studies and reviews. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamins or mineral supplements with placebo, administered to healthy people with the aim of preventing lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies that evaluated mortality in elderly subjects who received mechanical ventilation had conflicting results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of age on mortality. METHODS: A number of medical literature databases and the references listed (from 1974 to May 2015) were searched for studies that compared 2 different age groups. The primary outcome was mortality in subjects ages > 65 y. The severity scores, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and the presence of ventilator-associated pneumonia were secondary outcomes. Finally, mortality in the subjects with ARDS and of cutoff ages 70 and 80 y was assessed by subgroup analysis. Evidence quality was assessed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria score. RESULTS: Of the 5,182 articles identified, 21 were included. Subjects ages > 65 y had higher mortalities (odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.56 –2.08; I2 _ 71%). APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II revealed intergroup differences (mean difference 3.07, 95% CI 2.52–3.61; I2 _ 0%), whereas neither the ICU nor hospital length of stay (mean difference 1.27, 95% CI _0.82 to 3.36, I2 _ 82%, and mean difference 1.29, 95% CI _0.71 to 3.29, I2 _ 0%, respectively) nor the groups in the 2 studies that assessed ventilator-associated pneumonia exhibited any difference. Subgroup analysis revealed a higher mortality in the older subjects, in the subjects with ARDS (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30 –2.36; I2 _ 0%) and in the subjects ages 70 and 80 y (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.51–2.10, I2 _ 71%; and OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.81–2.13, I2 _ 0%, respectively). The quality of associated evidence was low or very low. CONCLUSIONS: Although low-quality evidence was available, we conclude that age is associated with a greater mortality in critical subjects who were receiving mechanical ventilation.