Research Outputs

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Prevalencia de debilidad muscular en personas mayores chilenas: Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2016-2017

2020, Dr. Garrido-Méndez, Alex, Dr. Matus-Castillo, Carlos, Dra. Troncoso-Pantoja, Claudia, Concha-Cisternas, Yeny, Cigarroa, Igor, Leiva-Ordoñez, Ana, Martínez-Sanguinetti, María, Ulloa, Natalia, Gabler, María, Petermann-Rocha, Fanny, Parra-Soto, Solange, Díaz, Ximena, Celis-Morales, Carlos

Background: Handgrip strength is an indicator of frailty in older people. Aim: To determine the prevalence of low handgrip strength in older Chilean adults. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 244 individuals aged 60 years or more, participating in the 2016-2017 Chilean National Health Survey, was carried out. Handgrip strength was evaluated by a hand dynamometer and low grip strength was determined as a grip strength ≤ 15 kg and ≤ 27 kg for women and men, respectively. Results: Twenty nine percent of participants had low grip strength. The average grip strength among 60-year-old men and women was 34.7 and 22.1 kg, respectively. These figures decreased to 28.8 kg and 17.2 kg among 90-year-old men and women, respectively. The prevalence of low grip strength in men and women aged 60 years was 18%. In 90-year-old men and women, these figures increased to 79% and 56.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of low grip strength increased substantially with age.

Thumbnail Image
Publication

Prevalencia de fragilidad en personas mayores de Chile: Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2016-2017

2020, Dra. Troncoso-Pantoja, Claudia, Concha-Cisternas, Yeny, Leiva-Ordoñez, Ana, Martínez-Sanguinetti, María, Petermann-Rocha, Fanny, Díaz-Martínez, Ximena, Martorell, Miquel, Nazar, Gabriela, Ulloa, Natalia, Cigarroa-Cuevas, Igor, Albala, Cecilia, Márquez, Carlos, Lera, Lydia, Celis-Morales, Carlos

Background: The assessment of frailty among older people could help to reduce its social and health burden. Aim: To determine and characterize the prevalence of frailty in Chilean older adults. Material and Methods: We studied 233 participants, aged > 60 years, participating in the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017. Frailty was assessed using modified Fried criteria. Thus, people classified as frail should meet at least 3 out of the 5 criteria (low strength, low physical activity, low body mass index, slow walking pace and tiredness). Results: The prevalence of frailty was 10.9% (7.7% for men and 14.1% for women). The prevalence of pre-frailty was 59.0% whereas 30.1% of participants were classified as robust. At the age of 80 years 58 and 62% of men and women were frail, respectively. These figures increased to 90 and 87% at the age of 90 years. The prevalence of pre-frailty increased from 43 to 92.1% among men and from 76% and 78% among women from the ages of 60 to 90 years, respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of frailty increased markedly with age. It is important to implement prevention strategies to allow an early identification of high-risk individuals.

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Frailty in Chile: Development of a frailty index score using the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–2017

2023, Diaz-Toro, F., Petermann-Rocha, Fanny, Lynskey, N., Nazar, G., Cigarroa, I., Troncoso-Pantoja, Claudia, Concha-Cisternas, Y., Leiva-Ordoñez, A. M., Martinez-Sanguinetti, M. A., Parra-Soto, S., Celis-Moral, C.

Background: The Frailty Index (FI) is used to quantify and summarize vulnerability status in people. In Chile, no development and assessment of a FI have been explored. Objective: To develop and evaluate a FI using representative data from Chilean adults aged 40 years and older stratified by sex. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: National representative data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016–2017 (CNHS 2016–2017). Participants: 3,036 participants older than 40 years with complete data for all variables. Measurements: A 49-item FI was developed and evaluated. This FI included deficits from comorbidities, functional limitations, mental health status, physical activity, anthropometry, medications, and falls. A score between 0 and 1 was calculated for each person. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were employed to evaluate the FI’s performance in the population. Comparative analyses were carried out to evaluate the FI score by age (<60 and ≥ 60 years). Results: The mean FI score was 0.15 (SD:0.09), with a 99% upper limit of 0.46. Scores were greater in women than men (0.17 [SD:0.09]) vs. 0.12 [0.08]); in people older than 80 years (0.22 [0.11]), and in people with ≤8 years of education (0.18 [0.10]) compared with those with >12 years (0.12 [0.08]). The average age-related increase in the FI was 2.3%. When a cut-off point ≥ 0.25 was applied, the prevalence of frail individuals was 11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 to 13.8) in the general population. The prevalence was higher in women 15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 to 18.9] than men 7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 to 10.1]. In a comparative analysis by age, higher FI mean scores and prevalence of frail were observed in people ≥ 60 than younger than 60. Conclusions: The mean FI score and frailty prevalence were higher in women than men, in people with fewer years of formal education, and incremented markedly with age. This FI can be used for early detection of frailty status focusing on women and middle-aged people as a strategy to delay or prevent frailty-related consequences.