• Home
  • UCSC journals portal
  • ANID repository
  • UCSC Thesis Repository
  • English
  • Español
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Productividad Científica
  3. Publicaciones Científicas
  4. Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise
 
Options
Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Fernandes, John
García-Ramos, Amador
Facultad de Educación 
10.1016/j.jshs.2021.11.003
Journal of Sport and Health Science
2023
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of load_x0001_velocity (L_x0001_V) relationship variables obtained through the 2-point method using different load combinations and velocity variables.
Methods: Twenty men performed 2 identical sessions consisting of 2 countermovement jumps against 4 external loads (20 kg, 40 kg, 60 kg, and 80 kg) and a heavy squat against a load linked to a mean velocity (MV) of 0.55 m/s (load0.55). The L_x0001_V relationship variables (load-axis intercept (L0), velocity-axis intercept (v0), and area under the L_x0001_V relationship line (Aline)) were obtained using 3 velocity variables (MV, mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and peak velocity) by the multiple-point method including (20_x0001_40_x0001_60_x0001_80_x0001_load0.55) and excluding (20_x0001_40_x0001_60_x0001_80) the heavy squat, as well as from their respective 2-point methods (20_x0001_load0.55 and 20_x0001_80).
Results: The L_x0001_V relationship variables were obtained with an acceptable reliability (coefficient of variation (CV) _x0001_ 7.30%; intra-class correlation coefficient 0.63). The reliability of L0 and v0 was comparable for both methods (CVratio (calculated as higher value/lower value): 1.11_x0001_1.12), but the multiple-point method provided Aline with a greater reliability (CVratio = 1.26). The use of a heavy squat provided the L_x0001_V relationship variables with a comparable or higher reliability than the use of a heavy countermovement jump load (CVratio: 1.06_x0001_1.19).
The peak velocity provided the load_x0001_velocity relationship variables with the greatest reliability (CVratio: 1.15_x0001_1.86) followed by the MV (CVratio: 1.07_x0001_1.18), and finally the MPV. The 2-point methods only revealed an acceptable validity for the MV and MPV (effect size _x0001_ 0.19; Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient 0.96; Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient 0.94).
Conclusion: The 2-point method obtained from a heavy squat load and MV or MPV is a quick, safe, and reliable procedure to evaluate the lower-body maximal neuromuscular capacities through the L_x0001_V relationship.
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

1-s2.0-S2095254621001265-main.pdf

Size

916.71 KB

Format

Checksum
Force velocity relationship
Mean velocity
Multiple
Point method
Peak velocity
Velocity
Based training
Otras ciencias sociales
Ciencias de la salud
Historial de mejoras
Proyecto financiado por: