Options
Influence of holding weights of different magnitudes on intraocular pressure and anterior eye biometrics
Vera, Jesús
Redondo, Beatríz
Molina, Rubén
García-Ramos, Amador
Jiménez, Raimundo
Springer
2019
Purpose This study is aimed at determining the impact of holding weight corresponding to the 10% and 20% of participants’ body weight during 5-min on intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior eye biometrics.
Methods Eighteen healthy young adults grabbed two jugs with comfort-grip handles, which were filled with water in order to achieve the desirable load (10% and 20% of participants’ body weight). A rebound tonometer and Oculus Pentacam were used to assess IOP and anterior segment biometrics, respectively, at baseline, after 0.5, 2, 3.5, and 5 min of holding weights, as well as after 0.5 and 2 min of recovery in each experimental condition (control, 10%, and 20%). Results There was a significant effect of the load used on IOP (p = 0.016, ƞp 2 = 0.215) and anterior chamber angle (p = 0.018, ƞp 2 = 0.211), with the load corresponding to 20% of participants’ body weight promoting a significant IOP rise (corrected p value = 0.035, d = 0.67), and anterior chamber angle reduction (corrected p value = 0.029, d = 0.69) in comparison with the control condition. No effects of holding weight were observed for anterior chamber depth and central corneal thickness (p > 0.348). Conclusions Our data evidence that holding weight during 5 min increases IOP and narrows the anterior chamber angle, being these effects significant when using a load corresponding to 20% of body weight. Based on the current outcomes, lifting or carrying heavy loads may be discouraged for glaucoma patients or individuals at high risk for glaucoma onset, although future studies should explore the clinical relevance of our findings.
Methods Eighteen healthy young adults grabbed two jugs with comfort-grip handles, which were filled with water in order to achieve the desirable load (10% and 20% of participants’ body weight). A rebound tonometer and Oculus Pentacam were used to assess IOP and anterior segment biometrics, respectively, at baseline, after 0.5, 2, 3.5, and 5 min of holding weights, as well as after 0.5 and 2 min of recovery in each experimental condition (control, 10%, and 20%). Results There was a significant effect of the load used on IOP (p = 0.016, ƞp 2 = 0.215) and anterior chamber angle (p = 0.018, ƞp 2 = 0.211), with the load corresponding to 20% of participants’ body weight promoting a significant IOP rise (corrected p value = 0.035, d = 0.67), and anterior chamber angle reduction (corrected p value = 0.029, d = 0.69) in comparison with the control condition. No effects of holding weight were observed for anterior chamber depth and central corneal thickness (p > 0.348). Conclusions Our data evidence that holding weight during 5 min increases IOP and narrows the anterior chamber angle, being these effects significant when using a load corresponding to 20% of body weight. Based on the current outcomes, lifting or carrying heavy loads may be discouraged for glaucoma patients or individuals at high risk for glaucoma onset, although future studies should explore the clinical relevance of our findings.
Pentacam
Rebound tonometry
Iridocorneal angle
Glaucoma management
Anterior eye segment
Medicina clínica