Publication:
Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise

No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Authors
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Fernandes, John
García-Ramos, Amador
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of Sport and Health Science
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of load_x0001_velocity (L_x0001_V) relationship variables obtained through the 2-point method using different load combinations and velocity variables. Methods: Twenty men performed 2 identical sessions consisting of 2 countermovement jumps against 4 external loads (20 kg, 40 kg, 60 kg, and 80 kg) and a heavy squat against a load linked to a mean velocity (MV) of 0.55 m/s (load0.55). The L_x0001_V relationship variables (load-axis intercept (L0), velocity-axis intercept (v0), and area under the L_x0001_V relationship line (Aline)) were obtained using 3 velocity variables (MV, mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and peak velocity) by the multiple-point method including (20_x0001_40_x0001_60_x0001_80_x0001_load0.55) and excluding (20_x0001_40_x0001_60_x0001_80) the heavy squat, as well as from their respective 2-point methods (20_x0001_load0.55 and 20_x0001_80). Results: The L_x0001_V relationship variables were obtained with an acceptable reliability (coefficient of variation (CV) _x0001_ 7.30%; intra-class correlation coefficient 0.63). The reliability of L0 and v0 was comparable for both methods (CVratio (calculated as higher value/lower value): 1.11_x0001_1.12), but the multiple-point method provided Aline with a greater reliability (CVratio = 1.26). The use of a heavy squat provided the L_x0001_V relationship variables with a comparable or higher reliability than the use of a heavy countermovement jump load (CVratio: 1.06_x0001_1.19). The peak velocity provided the load_x0001_velocity relationship variables with the greatest reliability (CVratio: 1.15_x0001_1.86) followed by the MV (CVratio: 1.07_x0001_1.18), and finally the MPV. The 2-point methods only revealed an acceptable validity for the MV and MPV (effect size _x0001_ 0.19; Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient 0.96; Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient 0.94). Conclusion: The 2-point method obtained from a heavy squat load and MV or MPV is a quick, safe, and reliable procedure to evaluate the lower-body maximal neuromuscular capacities through the L_x0001_V relationship.
Description
Keywords
Force velocity relationship, Mean velocity, Multiple, Point method, Peak velocity, Velocity, Based training
Citation